NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Sample Answer for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation Included After Question
Assessment Description
The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient outcomes.
For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional group of your peers.
Click here ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic
Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. Be sure to consider your personal demeanor and tone during the recorded presentation.
Include the following in your presentation:
- Introduction (include PICOT statement)
- Organizational Culture and Readiness
- Problem Statement and Literature Review
- Change Model, or Framework
- Implementation Plan
- Evaluation Plan
- Conclusion
You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Loom
Loom is a free video recording tool that allows you send messages through shareable videos. For assistance on installing the software or usag
…
Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects
Read “Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects,” by Siedlecki, from
…
Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation
Read “Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation,” by Bodin and McDaniel, from Alabama Nurse (2019).
Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge
Read “Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge,” by Sawaya, from International Journal of Childbirth Ed
…
Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory
Read “Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory,” by Ligita, Francis, Wicking, Harvey, and Nurjannah, from Nurs
…
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapters 22 and 23 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities
Read “Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities,” by Cunningham-Erves, May
…
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference
Read “Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference,” by Douglas, Jackson, Woods, and Usher,
…
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation- Rubric
Introduction
Criteria Description
Introduction
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An introduction is not included.
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
Criteria Description
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization.
Problem Statement and Literature Review
Criteria Description
Problem Statement and Literature Review
5. 5: Excellent
18 points
The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout.
4. 4: Good
16.56 points
The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.84 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.
Change Model or Framework
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan
Criteria Description
Implementation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The implementation plan is not described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is only partially described.
Evaluation Plan
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Conclusion
Criteria Description
Conclusion
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A conclusion is not presented.
Research
Criteria Description
Research
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
Presentation
Criteria Description
Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.
Aesthetic Quality
Criteria Description
Aesthetic Quality
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.
Synthesis
Criteria Description
Synthesis
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.
Mechanics of Writing
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
Documentation of Sources
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Sources are not documented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Title: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Achieving patient safety implores nurses and other healthcare professionals to develop interventions that improve quality care and reduces occurrence of hospital acquired infections (HAIs). The use of evidence-based practice interventions like hand hygiene protocols and measures that include handwashing with soap and water alongside sanitizers can prevent and reduce the prevalence of hospital acquired infections (Zhao et al., 2017). Nurses in pediatric care settings should set high levels of hygiene to minimize the occurrence of HAIs in these settings. The integration of EBP interventions mitigates the increasing prevalence of HAIs and their associated cost burden to patients, their families and the health care system (Akanji et al., 2017). Hospital acquired infections constitute a significant part of the increased mortality and morbidity and poor outcomes among pediatric patients. The purpose of this presentation is to detail the evidence-based practice project proposal on hand hygiene measures involving handwashing with soap and water alongside use of hand sanitizer by healthcare workers, especially nurses, in reducing and preventing the occurrence of hospital acquired infections in pediatric care settings.
Evidence-based practice continues to be a critical component of enhancing care delivery among patients in different settings. The use of EBP entails incorporation of research evidence together with patient preferences and clinician’s care experience. Evidence-based practice aims at optimization of provider and team behavior to support changes in patient conduct to attain quality care, and provides education to reduce the risks of hospital acquired infections and improve different aspects of care provision (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). EBP also encourages the use of resources and services, and improvement in patients and their families’ satisfaction (Zhao et al., 2018). The EBP project will also focus on enhancing patient safety, improving adherence to hand hygiene measures, and improving outcomes and quality management to reduce adverse events. The project also focuses on decreasing the overall cost of infections, length of stay, and readmissions, and ensure that providers can make better care decisions in managing adverse events resulting from HAIs. The PICOT Question for the project is
Among healthcare worker in pediatric settings (P), how does handwashing with soap and water alongside hand sanitizer (I), compared to handwashing with soap and water alone (C), reduce hospital acquired infections (O), with six months (T)?
Organizational culture is an essential part of implementing change as it mirrors values, mission, and vision and employee perception to adopting new ways of doing things. A decentralized and hierarchical culture where employees get involved in decision-making and has robust values and norms leads to effective implementation of EBP project proposal. The proposed structure enhances employee motivation and diversification. Decentralization improves communication and ensures implementation of new approaches to doing things to enhance quality care (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Organizations ready to implement the proposed EBP interventions should focus on patient-centered care and health promotion to save lives in pediatric settings.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
The project uses the Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool (OCAT) developed by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The tool assesses overall readiness to enhance health interventions in organizations. The tool identifies substantive capacities and strengths that exist and the need for more to attain expected outcomes. Implementing the proposed EBP requires organizations to have capabilities and resources with a superb culture based on their mission, purpose and best values. Threats to readiness include need for resources to implement the project and technologies to reduce HAIs. Teamwork leads to effective flow of information to implement the project and attain expected outcomes.
Organizations that seek to implement the proposed EBP should enhance their patient-handling processes with a focus on improved quality care to reduce infections by better hand hygiene measures and protocols. Data-analysis tool using a collaborative approach will enhance dissemination of evidence to the entire care team. The deployment of Trans-theoretical model will allow the organizations to prepare for change by aligning their interventions with their needs. These include skills’ training and motivation policies to enact changes to focus on solutions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The integration of technology is also critical to enhancing organizations’ readiness since it improves gathering of intelligence.
The stakeholders include healthcare professionals in these settings comprising of nurses, physicians and other professionals and the management. External stakeholders comprise of patients and their familiescare (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Further, the integration of the Project team and management highlights the importance of ensuring that the organization is ready while use of health information technologies like Telehealth leads to better understanding of the underlying issues to enhance patient safety based on existing deployment and their role in enhancing access and quality care.
Hospital acquired infections are a concern in healthcare as they impact positive patient outcomes and patient safety. Healthcare workers, especially nurses, transmit infections to patients through poor hand hygiene measures and protocols in their practice environment. Pediatric patients have increased susceptibility to suffering from infections due to their low levels of immunity (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Imperatively, nurses and other providers must develop interventions to prevent and control the prevalence of nosocomial infections and guarantee quality care by using evidence-based practice interventions like handwashing with soap and water alongside use of hand sanitizer(Khan et al., 2018). The initiative focuses on enhancing hand hygiene protocols by nurses to help reduce most prevalent infections like central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia and surgical sites infections.
The proposed interventions must be effective by ensuring that existing literature consisting of previous research studies support its implementation and expected benefits to the target audience or population. In this case, through a comprehensive search of the literature, one can ascertain if the interventions meets the stakeholders’ goals and aspirations (Zhao et al., 2018). The literature review for the project entails defining and using terms related to hospital acquired infections, healthcare workers and hand hygiene measures. The review also used effective search engines and databases related to the nursing issues to ensure that the generated article represent the problem under study (Khan et al., 2018). The main inclusion criteria included article published within the last five years, articles that capture aspects of the PICOT question and support the EBP based on their findings or recommendations.
The proposed project reviewed different research studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria to ascertain support for the interventions to enhance patient safety through hand hygiene measures. Two of the articles used demonstrate the significance of hand hygiene measures among nurses and other healthcare workers in reducing and preventing hospital acquired infections. The articles assert the need to implement evidence-based interventions to prevent infections and improve patient safety (Ni et al., 2020; Setty et al., 2019). Making hand hygiene attractive to nurses and other healthcare workers is essential. Zhao et al. (2017) and Staniford et al. (2020) demonstrate the need for behavioral change and ensuring that nurses accept the modifications to reduce infections. Compliance to hand hygiene measures requires changes in behavior, especially embracing handwashing with soap and water alongside the use of hand sanitizers. The literature articles illustrate that providing sufficient education to nurses and using evidence-based interventions increase the adoption of these measures leading to a reduction of hospital acquired infections in pediatric settings. Use of agile approach is effective in reducing a host of infections that include central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABIs).
The reviewed articles illustrate similar themes about the effects of HAUs and utilization of Hand Hygiene measures to reduce their prevalence and ensure that patients get quality care. The articles emphasize the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to reduce hospital acquired infections. All the article show that HAIs have negative effects on patient safety and health and are a public health issue (Staniford et al., 2018). Stakeholders play a critical part in implementation of interventions to reduce HAIs in pediatric setting through giving information and offering educational opportunities to nurses and other health care professionals to enhance their care delivery. The articles suggest the need for more studies to help evaluate the effectiveness of hand hygiene measure to control infections.
The project selected the Iowa EBP model as its change framework. The Iowa model focuses on the whole healthcare system and its stakeholders that include patients, practitioners, and infrastructure. The model uses a problem-solving approach in EBP implementation and leads staff to question the current nursing practices and if they can enhance care through using current findings. The model is effective for the project as it focuses on promoting quality care using EBP interventions. The initials stage of the model is identification and selection of a health problem while the second stage involved determining if the issue is healthcare organization’s prioritycare (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The third stage requires reflection about the issue of interest and engaging stakeholders while the fourth stage is to identify availability and merit of the chosen evidence. The fifth stage entails implementation of a pilot change based on the available evidence and its credibility. The sixth stage is to appraise the pilot practice change based on the degree of success and subsequent dissemination of findings to the providers and organizations.
The project’s setting will be a pediatric hospital were nurse practitioners and clinical nurses leaders are involved in care delivery to young patients. The selected participants will be 20 healthcare staff having worked in the facility for at least the last 12 months. The team will get approval from the participants through signing a consent form to participate in the project. The implementation timeframe for the project will be 6 months and there will be different activities; right from the establishment of a multidisciplinary team, education, rolling out of pilot change, and reviewing the implementation (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). The project will require a host of resources that include human resources, funding, expertise and advice from stakeholders.
The project will use a qualitative design which effective in collecting data from participants as it deploys various approaches in getting opinions from healthcare workers on the issue. The monitoring instruments will include audit tool and satisfaction survey to gauge the level of implementation and satisfaction among the different stakeholders.
Delivery process for the intervention would include project team members that include nurse leaders and practitioners. Nurse leaders and practitioners will develop and implement requisite protocols like setting hand sanitizer stations at various points of care. Participants will also go through mandatory training on the suggested protocols and their significance to enhancing patient safety. Support from stakeholders is essential in EBP projects as they offer resources, input and suggestions and implement recommendations of such programs (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). Stakeholders in the project will include nurse leaders and nurse practitioners, project team and trainers, and the management of respective organizations.
Components of the project will include facilitators, challenges and development of effective strategies to overcome the inadequacies. Resource and time limitation, insufficient skills among nurses and negative attitude would be some of the potential challenges to the project. Successful strategies to overcome the challenges would include adhering to the timeframe, engagement of stakeholders and effective communication (Vandermouse et al., 2017). The project is feasibility based on the cost-benefit analysis as its implementation will cost less that expected long-term and short-term benefits.
The expected outcomes from the problem include enhanced patient safety, quality care and use of better interventions by healthcare workers to reduce and prevent HAIs in pediatric settings. The project will also lead to knowledge dissemination among healthcare workers in the settings to reduce HAIs. The EBP project will enhance hand hygiene measures and protocols among healthcare workers (Vax et al., 2017). The project is expected to reduce the rate of HAIs and expand adoption of hand hygiene measures. The project will use a qualitative research design to understand ideas, thoughts and experiences of research subjects in connection to the proposed project and its importance to the target population (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). The project will use institutional interviews where the participants will fill questionnaires detailing their experiences and thoughts about the issue. The statistical test for the project will be regression test as it has stringent requirement and make strong inferences based on the gathered data. The test will be use to measure the cause-and-effects of implementing the interventions in healthcare settings.
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation References
Akanji, J., Walker, J. &Christian, R. (2017). Effectiveness of formal hand hygiene education and feedback on
healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance and hospital-associated. JBI Database System
Review and Implementation Repository, 15(5): 1272-1279. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003019.
Ni, L., Wang, Q., Wang, F., Ni, Z., Zhang, S., Zhong, Z., & Chen, Z. (2020). An interventional implementation
project: hand hygiene improvement. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8(18). doi: 10.21037/atm-
20-5480
Setty, K., Cronk, R., George, S., Anderson, D., O’Flaherty, G., & Bartram, J. (2019). Adapting translational
research methods to water, sanitation, and hygiene. International journal of environmental
research and public health, 16(20), 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204049
Stanford, L. J. & Schmidtke, K. A. (2020). A systematic review of hand-hygiene and environmental-
disinfection interventions in settings with children. BMC Public Health, 20(195).
Zhao, Q., Yang, M. M., Huang, Y. Y. & Chen, W. (2017). How to make hand hygiene interventions more
attractive to nurses: A discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0202014.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202014
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Title: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
“Conference presentations offer rich and dynamic opportunities to share and learn knowledge and enhance clinical expertise pertaining to EBP, evidence-based quality improvement, case studies, program evaluation, and research.”(Melnyk; 2019) Every year there are specialty conferences for different specialties i.e Trauma, emergency, public health etc. Submitting an abstract of the proposal to be presented at such conference is a great way to disseminate the EBP and gain awareness. At theses conferences all stakeholders who are healthcare providers in some form or fashion attend and will most likely be involved in the EBP.
This will require internal approval by the facility because you are a representation of them and will use their affiliation in order to submit the proposal. It will also require external approval by the conference you are submitting to. Communication techniques should include powerpoints, games, handouts. Anything to keep learners involved and keep their attention. The adult learner loses interest in the first 2 minutes of learning. You must know your audience and cater to them as such.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. ISBN-13: 9781496384539
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.