Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health Management

Sample Answer for Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health Management Included After Question

Description:

 The purpose of this assignment is to write a review of the research articles you evaluated in your Topic 5

“Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature” assignment. If you have been directed by your instructor to select different articles in order to meet the requirements for a literature review or to better support your evidence-based practice project proposal, complete this step prior to writing your review.

A literature review provides a concise comparison of the literature for the reader and explains how the research demonstrates support for your PICOT. You will use the literature review in this assignment in NUR-590, during which you will write a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500, select eight of the ten articles you evaluated that demonstrate clear support for your evidence-based practice and complete the following for each article:

1. Introduction – Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing. Present your PICOT statement.
2. Search methods – Describe your search strategy and the criteria that you used in choosing and searching for your
3. Synthesis of the literature – For each article, write a paragraph discussing the main components (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how the article supports your PICOT.
4. Comparison of articles – Compare the articles (similarities and differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, controversies).
5. Suggestions for future research: Based on your analysis of the literature, discuss identified gaps and which areas require further research.
6. Conclusion – Provide a summary statement of what you found in the literature.
7. Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health Management

Title: Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health Management

Week 6 Assignment

Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review

Does provision of evidence-based education on cervical cancer screening increase the screening uptake within three months among women age between 20 and 35 years. Cervical cancer is a major public health concern that contributes about 12.9% of all cancer new cases. Furthermore, the disease contributes to about 11.84% of cases of all cancer deaths (Ngune, Kalembo, Loessl & Kivuti-Bitok, 2020). Furthermore, about nine women aged between 20 and 30 years die of cervical cancer every day (Ngune, Kalembo, Loessl & Kivuti-Bitok, 2020). The statistics show that cervical cancer is a major health threat especially among women aged between 20 and 30 years. The disease is caused by HPV infections. Most of the infections are transitory while others may persist especially when the patient has a reduced immune system due to other diseases such as HIV and diabetes. Women in their twenties are sexually active and this means that they have a high risk of getting HPV infections and cervical cancer. Having more than one sexual partners could also increase the risk of acquiring one of the many strains of HPV. Studies indicate that the incidences of cervical cancer among the population group almost doubled between 2000 and 2009. Furthermore, despite the surge in the incidences of cervical cancer among the populations; the uptake rates for the screening services are significantly low. Lack of cervical cancer screening among the populations means that many cases are diagnosed at advanced stages and so leading to poor prognosis. The survival rates for patients with cervical cancer are low because of the late diagnosis.

Method

The study involves a review of the relevant literature published on the topic. Credible and reliable sources were used in the study. The key search words used in identifying appropriate articles for the study included, ‘‘cervical cancer among women aged between 20nd 30 years,’’ ‘‘cervical cancer uptake among young women’’ and ‘‘prevalence and burden of cervical cancer among young women.’’ Articles published not later than 5 years ago were used to provide updated information on the health issue. A total of 20 articles were identified based on the above key search phrases. The articles were further analyzed for credibility. The first criteria for determining the reliability of the source was determining whether it is peer-reviewed or not. Peer-reviewed studies were used. Furthermore, the methods employed in the study were determined. The credibility of the findings published in a study depends on the method employed in the research process. As a result, the articles with properly outlined methods and adequate sample populations were selected. The goal of criticizing the articles is to ensure that factual and valid evidence is provided to support the findings in this study.

Literature Synthesis

Heena et al. (2019) explored the knowledge, attitude, and practices towards cervical cancer screening among female healthcare practitioners. The study involved a cross-sectional approach where a total of 420 participants were recruited, but, only 395 participants responded to the surveys. The stratified random sampling was used with the participants including a physician, nurses, and healthcare workers. The study reported that 93% of the participants lacked knowledge on the cervical cancer symptoms, preventive measures, and the behaviours that could dispose of one to the disease. The study provides relevant findings to the fact that low uptake for cervical cancer screening among young women is attributed to a lack of knowledge as outlined in the PICOT. The fact that many healthcare professionals are not aware of the cervical cancer signs and symptoms, as well as the preventive measures, shows that the patients cannot also access such vital information. The apathy in information access concerning cervical cancer management and prevention presents a serious threat to public health.

Furthermore, Chang et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional study to explore the factors that affected cervical cancer screening choices among the populations. The study hypothesized that cervical cancer screening uptake among young Korean women was low. The study recruited a total of 3734 participants to explore factors that influenced their willingness to go for the cancer screening as outlined in the current study’s PICOT. The study reported that age, education, job status, and household income influenced the willingness of women to go for cervical cancer tests. The household income was only relevant among the women aged between 30 and 39 years. On the other hand, women aged between 15 and 29 years were mainly influenced by the education factor. The study identified multifactorial issues that affect the cervical cancer screening choices among women thus building on the scope of the current study. The goal of the current study is to implement education provision to the population to help reduce the burden of cervical cancer. Therefore, the findings in the study by Chang et al. (2017) prove the relevance of the intervention defined in the PICOT.

Also, Binka et al. (2019) analyzed the barriers to cervical cancer treatment and screening among rural women in Ghana. The study involved in-depth interviews conducted among 25 women. The findings show that psychological convictions, low level of knowledge on cervical cancer screening and treatment, and perceived lack of privacy influenced the low uptake in cervical cancer screening. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the role of lack of education in the constrained cervical cancer screening. The study contributes significantly to the understanding of the problem among the populations outlined in the PICOT. There is a significant dearth of information and knowledge about cervical cancer screening, treatment, and prevention measures among the populations.

Tapera et al. (2019) corroborates the findings in the other studies through the study conducted to explore the attitudes of women aged below 25 years towards cervical cancer. The study involved a sequential exploratory mixed approach. The findings showed that the levels of knowledge vary. The study reports that only 23% of the participants knew the causes of cervical cancer. On the other hand, 80% were aware of the treatment for cervical cancer.

Comparison

The studies reviewed reveal the need to increase cervical cancer screening awareness and education among the populations. The studies recruited a cross-sectional method in exploring the health issue; the method provides wide and reliable data to support the conclusions arrived. The study by Binka et al. (2019) recruited 25 members; however, the data collection approach was intensive considering that an in-depth interview was conducted. The findings from the study supplement the reports were given by Chang et al. (2017) and Heena, et al (2019) who employed survey methods in data collection.

The report given by the studies are consistent and support the PICOT for the current study. The studies explored the health issue among different target populations. Heena, et al (2019) explored the knowledge among the women healthcare workers and this provides the background under which the analysis of the issue should start. Healthcare workers play important role in educating the public on proper health intervention and primary prevention approaches. Lack of such knowledge among the healthcare providers means that the population has no chance of getting such education unless other avenues for learning are developed. The other studies were conducted national wide among the general population and reports are consistent with what would be expected based on the report by Heena, et al (2019).

However, the report provided by Heena et al. (2019) could be exaggerated and contradicts the findings by Tapera et al. (2019). While there is a gap in the knowledge on cervical cancer prevention and treatment among women, it sounds controversial that 93% of the women healthcare workers are not aware of the cause, signs and symptoms, and the treatment for cervical cancer.

Areas of Further Study

The findings provide sufficient data on the role of education in addressing cervical cancer. On the other hand, there is a need to explore further the role of socio-cultural factors and their implications on the effectiveness of the education programs to combat the disease. The findings from the previous studies show that providing education to the public could play an important role in reducing the burden of cervical cancer. However, socio-cultural factors could have confounding effects and that is it is important to explore the topic deeper and develop appropriate interventions. The level of knowledge also varies with the variations in the population’s level of education and economic status.

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health Management References

Binka, C., Nyarko, S. H., Awusabo-Asare, K., & Doku, D. T. (2019). Barriers to the uptake of cervical cancer screening and treatment among rural women in Ghana. BioMed research international, 2019.

Chang, H. K., Myong, J. P., Byun, S. W., Lee, S. J., Lee, Y. S., Lee, H. N., … & Park, T. C. (2017). Factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening among young Koreans: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 7(4).

Heena, H., Durrani, S., AlFayyad, I., Riaz, M., Tabasim, R., Parvez, G., & Abu-Shaheen, A. (2019). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards cervical cancer and screening amongst female healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study. Journal of oncology, 2019.

Ngune, I., Kalembo, F., Loessl, B., & Kivuti-Bitok, L. W. (2020). Biopsychosocial risk factors and knowledge of cervical cancer among young women: A case study from Kenya to inform HPV prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0237745.

Tapera, O., Dreyer, G., Kadzatsa, W., Nyakabau, A. M., Stray-Pedersen, B., & SJH, H. (2019). Cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices of women aged at least 25 years in Harare, Zimbabwe. BMC Women’s Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0790-6

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health ManagementIn Part A, you described the population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process.

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health ManagementUse the Library to perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT. Include the following:

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health ManagementIntroduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing.

Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health Management

Synthesize the Literature: Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT; Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies.

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health ManagementAreas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study.

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health ManagementPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research and Population Health ManagementThis assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.